Beware of Short Sale Scams after Filing Bankruptcy

 

Today I learned of yet another scam being perpetrated on unsuspecting consumers after they file for bankruptcy. When a consumer surrenders their home or rental property in bankruptcy and the mortgage debt is discharged that should be the end of it, right? . . No. . .Unfortunately, until the lender forecloses the owner of the property still faces liability for property taxes, homeowner association dues and possibly for injury to third parties who come on the property for one reason or other. Since the debtor no longer has insurance on the property this can be a sticky issue.

 

To avoid this unwanted liability exposure consumers often try to arrange a short sale so the title will be transferred out of the consumer's name, thereby ending this liability exposure. A short sale is when someone buys the property but the lender accepts less than the full amount due to release its security interest. It sounds good but it is actually a perilous venture for the consumer to participate in.

 

First of all, the property owner isn't likely to get any compensation for his time and effort, so why bother? Sure it's good for closure and could stop further liability exposure, if I works, but rarely will the lender accept substantially less than the full balance owed on the note. Most of the time a short sale will be an exercise in futility.

 

Normally when a consumer surrenders property in bankruptcy it will become an asset of the bankruptcy estate to be administered by the trustee. In most cases the lender will have a security interest in the property so the trustee will abandon his interest in it, but what happens if the property is leased out and the lender doesn't foreclose for two or three years? The consumer is not entitled to the rent since he surrendered the property so it technically belongs to the estate.  But what if the trustee has abandoned the asset?

 

This happens fairly often so some ingenious scam-artists have emerged to take advantage of the situation. What they do is contact the debtor representing that they have someone interested in the property and ask if they can list it. The debtor is desperate to get rid of the property and the mortgage lender has suggested they would consider a short sale, so he agrees. What he doesn't realize is the scam artist doesn't intend to sell the property and pay off the mortgage, but only to exploit it until the mortgage company forecloses. This is done by renting out the property, collecting the rents for months or even years, and pocketing the money until the property is foreclosed.

 

The danger to the debtor/consumer is that by listing the property for sale and authorizing the realtor to rent out the property, the mortgage lender can assert that the debt is no longer discharged because the debtor has revoked his surrender. This becomes particularly important if a debtor tries to enforce his discharge or sue for FCRA violations. Another area of concern is that the Trustee may come back and want the rents collected on the property even though the debtor never got them. Since the debtor signed the listing agreement thereby inadvertently authorizing the property to be rented out, he may be held liable to the mortgage company or the trustee for the rents that were paid.

 

So, it is important for those consumer/debtors who have surrendered real property in bankruptcy to move out of the property promptly and have no further contact with the property or the mortgage company. That way there can never be any claim the debt has been revived or reinstated after the discharge. It's also a good idea to send the lender a certified letter telling it that the debtor does not want to get statements, calls, or other communications from the lender in the future, except what is absolutely required for foreclosure. And if a realtor calls, refer him to the lender.

For more information go to our Website or follow us on Facebook.

Crime Scene - Creditors Often Intentionally Misreport the Bankruptcy Discharge

 

A common problem for consumers who have surrendered their homes or rental property in bankruptcy is that their lenders or mortgage servicers often ignore the bankruptcy discharge and attempt to collect the mortgage deficiency. This illegal collection activity may take the form of statements, collection letters, notices of forced insurance placement, escrow reconciliations, modification offers, etc. The correspondence will say that it is for informational purposes only and to disregard it if the consumer has been through bankruptcy, but the statements usually demand the payment of money and provide an envelope to remit payment. Of course, these lenders and services hope the consumer will write a check and send it in even though they have no obligation to do so.

  

A worse problem is when the lender or mortgage servicer fails to update a consumer's credit report to show that the debt has been discharged in bankruptcy or report the debt as collectible when it is not. Although it is a crime in Texas to knowingly furnish false information to a credit bureau, the statute is rarely enforced by prosecutors. This results in the consumer not only suffering from the effects of the bankruptcy on his credit but also a delinquent mortgage. When a potential lender pulls the consumer's credit report it will appear that the mortgage has been reaffirmed, is past due, that the full balance is still owed. This could result in a consumer being denied credit in the future or, if credit is granted, having to pay a higher interest rate, and certainly will preclude getting new mortgage financing.

  

For some reason mortgage lenders and servicers have a difficult time shutting down their collection efforts even after they are told by the consumer or their attorneys to cease and desist. If this happens litigation may be necessary to enforce a consumer's rights.

 

Consumers who experience continued collection activity by lenders should keep all correspondence and emails and keep a log of all phone calls as these may be needed as evidence should litigation be necessary. It is also advisable to periodically review their credit reports to be sure the mortgage debt is being correctly reported.

 

It is expensive for lenders to ignore the bankruptcy discharge, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) or the dictates of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). I'm sure you have seen the huge settlements these lenders and servicers have been forced to pay by government regulators over the past year and doesn't include the millions in civil damages they must have paid to settle private suits, yet the abuses continue. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that these lenders and servicers must be making a lot of money by violating the law.

 

Visit our website or follow us on Facebook or  Twitter.

 

 

 

THE MOD - THE MORTGAGE LENDER'S SCAM

                The Mod

When I was young I often dreamt
Of owning a home one day
A great investment it would be
No money down, thirty years to pay

So my wife and I bought a house
And together we made it a home
A wonderful place to raise our kids
With lots of land for them to roam.

For years we lived there happily
Watching our children grow
Then one day my health went south
Couldn’t work, had to take life slow

My wife was forced to get a job
She worked hard but the pay was low
Unemployment checks weren’t enough
And all our debts began to grow

Missed a payment and then two.
Asked our lender what we should do.
No worry, they said. "We understand."
Just modify, add arrearage to the end.

Okay, sounds good, so what do we do now?
Fill out this form, they say. Send us this and that
No payments due until your loan’s approved
We’ll get this mod done in nothing flat

We do all they ask, they say, "Just relax."
Then a letter comes—YOUR PAYMENT’S LATE!
We wilt in disbelief. But you said don’t pay?
So now it’s ‘PAY UP’ or we’ll accelerate?

We call them, distraught, confused, upset
We don’t understand this turn of events?
After passing us around, a supervisor says
Ignore the letter, it shouldn’t have been sent.
　
　

But weeks go by, yet we’re not approved,
More letters come that make us squirm,
We call, complain, get passed around.
Don’t worry. All is well, they confirm.

Weeks stretch to months, still no word
Then a certified letter arrives in the mail.
I call, upset. They say, "Oh, don’t be concerned."
Oh really? What in the hell is a trustee’s sale?

They say it’s all a computer glitch
Just hang in there, your mod’s a go
But it’s from a law firm? I’m not convinced.
They say, they know, it’s okay, just breath slow.

I call again to find out what’s going on.
It’s your application, we can’t find it anywhere?
I sigh in utter disbelief, such incompetence.
It’s beyond belief, "I’ll kill them all," I swear.

Now the constable’s knocking at our door.
They said they‘d wait, they wouldn’t dare,
Sell our home at a foreclosure sale?
I call, mad as hell, but they don’t seem to care

It’s too late now. Tried to help you out, they contend.
We did our best. Sorry, what can we say?
But don’t despair,'Cash for Keys' is still a go
Move out now, no fuss, and have a nice day

Copyright William Manchee

Visit us on Facebook

Fair Credit Reporting Act Protects Creditors As Much As Consumers

Although you would think the Fair Credit Reporting Act was written to protect consumers, it also has provisions that protect creditors. One specific requirement that insulates creditors, at least under federal law, from liability exposure, is the requirement that consumers dispute erroneous items on their credit reports and give the offending creditor 30 days to confirm or correct the reporting. This may seem fair at first glance, but what if the erroneous reporting was intentional or resulted from gross negligence, which is often the case. Why should creditors be insulated from liability when they cause a consumer to lose an opportunity to buy a house or a car? Why should consumers have to endure the humiliation of a credit denial without recourse when a creditor makes an obvious mistake? Why should creditors get a free pass when they injure a consumer? It doesn’t make sense. There is no doubt the credit industry lobbied long and hard for this provision in the FCRA. Luckily there are state laws that don’t recognize this requirement to dispute erroneous credit before action can be taken against the offending creditor.
Visit us the Manchee & Manchee, PC website.