Showing posts with label bankruptcy code. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bankruptcy code. Show all posts

Saturday, March 8, 2014

Crime Scene - Creditors Often Intentionally Misreport the Bankruptcy Discharge


 
A common problem for consumers who have surrendered their homes or rental property in bankruptcy is that their lenders or mortgage servicers often ignore the bankruptcy discharge and attempt to collect the mortgage deficiency. This illegal collection activity may take the form of statements, collection letters, notices of forced insurance placement, escrow reconciliations, modification offers, etc. The correspondence will say that it is for informational purposes only and to disregard it if the consumer has been through bankruptcy, but the statements usually demand the payment of money and provide an envelope to remit payment. Of course, these lenders and services hope the consumer will write a check and send it in even though they have no obligation to do so.
  
A worse problem is when the lender or mortgage servicer fails to update a consumer's credit report to show that the debt has been discharged in bankruptcy or report the debt as collectible when it is not. Although it is a crime in Texas to knowingly furnish false information to a credit bureau, the statute is rarely enforced by prosecutors. This results in the consumer not only suffering from the effects of the bankruptcy on his credit but also a delinquent mortgage. When a potential lender pulls the consumer's credit report it will appear that the mortgage has been reaffirmed, is past due, that the full balance is still owed. This could result in a consumer being denied credit in the future or, if credit is granted, having to pay a higher interest rate, and certainly will preclude getting new mortgage financing.
  
For some reason mortgage lenders and servicers have a difficult time shutting down their collection efforts even after they are told by the consumer or their attorneys to cease and desist. If this happens litigation may be necessary to enforce a consumer's rights.
 
Consumers who experience continued collection activity by lenders should keep all correspondence and emails and keep a log of all phone calls as these may be needed as evidence should litigation be necessary. It is also advisable to periodically review their credit reports to be sure the mortgage debt is being correctly reported.
 
It is expensive for lenders to ignore the bankruptcy discharge, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) or the dictates of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). I'm sure you have seen the huge settlements these lenders and servicers have been forced to pay by government regulators over the past year and doesn't include the millions in civil damages they must have paid to settle private suits, yet the abuses continue. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that these lenders and servicers must be making a lot of money by violating the law.
 
Visit our website or follow us on Facebook or  Twitter.
 
 

 

Monday, February 17, 2014

Mortgage Lenders and Servicers Out of Control?

Mortgage Contracts Allow Creditors to Monitor Credit
Today I reviewed a husband and wife’s credit reports and was shocked to see what their mortgage servicer was doing to them. Over five years ago disaster struck this middle-aged couple, an illness and loss of employment forced them to file bankruptcy. They couldn’t afford their house payments so they surrendered their home in the bankruptcy, moved out, the debt was discharged, so they waited patiently for the lender to foreclose. The property was soon posted for foreclosure but for some unknown reason the foreclosure didn’t go through and hasn’t to this day.
     
Once the debt was discharged the lender no longer had a right to monitor or review the consumer's credit reports since there was no longer a debtor-creditor relationship. About a year later the mortgage servicer contacted the couple several times trying to get them to apply for a modification, do a short sale or give them a deed in lieu of foreclosure. The couple cooperated at first but when a short sale was offered to them it was rejected. The lender knew the couple was not qualified for a modification since they had vacated the property and the debt had been discharged. After the rejection the couple notified the lender in writing that they were fed up and would no longer participate in a short sale or deed in lieu of foreclosure and told them not to contact them in any manner in the future. The letter worked for a couple years and then suddenly the letters, statements, and phone calls began again.
  
When the couple came to us to see what could be done to stop the harassment we pulled their credit reports and were aghast to find out that in 2012 and 2013 the mortgage servicer had pulled their credit reports over 39 times without their consent and without a permissible purpose! It’s hard to believe that some of our leading financial institutions would be a party to such blatant invasions of privacy, but we see it far too often, not only with this servicer but with many others as well. Since the debt had been discharged and was uncollectible, the only conclusions we can draw are that the mortgage servicer doesn’t have the ability to control its automatic collection programs, it has no respect for their customer’s right to privacy, or both. Fortunately, there is a remedy for this flagrant violation of the law, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
 
Visit Manchee & Manchee PC on Facebook